The Federal Government and Other States Should Look To Minnesota Concerning Crane Operation

Mike Bryant
Attorney
(866) 735-1102 Ext 555
Visit Mike Bryant on FacebookVisit Mike Bryant on LinkedInVisit Mike Bryant on TwitterVisit Mike Bryant on Avvo
Posted by Mike BryantMay 11, 2009 12:21 PM

Two years ago, after a series of deaths involving cranes, Minnesota passed a law requiring that anyone operating a construction crane pass a certification test after undergoing classroom and practical training. Minnesota is one of about 13 states that require a license or certification to operate cranes, according to Glen Johnson, business manager of the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 49 chapter in Minneapolis.

Federally, there is no such requirement despite safety records showing that crane-related accidents kill about 90 workers in the United States each year. Johnson, who operated a crane for more than 15 years, says crane deaths are “unacceptable.” One of the problems: “everyone and his brother” is jumping in cranes on job sites, regardless of their qualifications to use the equipment. It’s ironic, he noted, that most states require a license to drive a car, but don’t have a similar requirement to operate a five-ton crane, which has the potential to tip over, strike an overhead power line or cause severe damage to bodies and property.

Few jobs are as dangerous as operating a crane, Johnson, who helped write the Minnesota certification law, told an OSHA panel in Washington, D.C., considering similar federal standards. But with proper national standards in place, he said, operators across the country can “greatly reduce the risk of injury or death.”

We have been involved in a number of these cases over the years. Usually they involved complicated interchanges with workers compensation coverage and also with the need for extensive investigation. The injuries are usually fatal or very severe. Hopefully, other governmental units will look to the helpful protections that Minnesota has.

6 Comments

Have an opinion about this post? Please consider leaving a comment or subscribing to the feed to have future articles delivered to your feed reader.

Daniel 8791
Posted by Daniel 8791
May 11, 2009 10:32 PM

I'm quite suprised that only 13 states require licensing for operating these huge and (potentially) dangerous machines. I think more insight and regulation is certainly just and hopefully on the table soon.

Mike BryantInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Mike Bryant
May 11, 2009 10:51 PM

That makes sense, thanks for taking the time to read and post a comment.

Sky Master
Posted by Sky Master
May 13, 2009 8:56 AM

The 13 states that require a national certification process for Crane Operators are only falling into the NCCCO notion that it will help safety. The only thing the NCCCO testing does is put money in thier bank (NCCCO) and eliminate the Operators who can't read for the test and have a hard time completing a practical task in a limited amount of time. We can take someone off of the streets, train them in how to pass the NCCCO tests and bingo, they have the Certification. Are they then considered a good and safe Crane Operator. Does NCCCO consider amount of sear time? No, only one that can pass a testing system. NCCCO eliminated the time of operations a long time ago when not enough Operators met the requirements. States and OSHA only need to look at the FAA-Federal Aviation Authority for proper methods of testing and logging of seat time in Cranes; type, model and make. Just because a Crane Operator is tested on one type of Crane does not make them capable of operating all Crane in that type (specialty. Now that another player has entered into the Certification process, NCCER, the NCCCO board has stated an individual can only hold one Examiners Authority for practical testing, not both. This is a direct conflict and monoply move on NCCCO's part to maintain control over the lucrative money they make in testing fees. Don't kid yourself, it's all about the money and control and NCCCO is doing their part to maintain that control.

Mike BryantInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Mike Bryant
May 13, 2009 9:01 AM

Interesting addition. I am looking at the safety issue and hope that the changes address that. The money issues are often there and interesting to find in some cases. Please feel free to addrss the safety issue if you get a chance. Thanks for taking the time to read and post a comment.

Daniel 8791
Posted by Daniel 8791
May 13, 2009 5:08 PM

"Eliminate the operators who can't read for the test" ?? What the hell ?

Mike BryantInjuryBoard Attorney Member
Posted by Mike Bryant
May 16, 2009 2:52 AM

yep, thanks for taking the time to read and post a comment.

Comments for this article are closed.

Subscribe to InjuryBoard St. Cloud

InjuryBoard St. Cloud RSS Feeds

Keep up with the latest updates using your favorite RSS reader

Injury Board St. Cloud is brought to you by Bradshaw & Bryant PLLC

Legal Assistance Center

More Info
Bradshaw & Bryant PLLC 866-735-1102 Ext 555 www.minnesotapersonalinjury.com
google
Personal Injury Lawyers Serving: St Cloud, Foley, Willmar, Elk River, Buffalo, Litchfield, Brainerd, Alexandria, Little Falls, Wadena, Minneapolis and Hastings, Marshall, Stillwater, Duluth, Grand Rapids, Bemidji, Detroit Lakes
1505 Division Street , Waite Park, Minnesota 56387 [ Show Map ]
Better Business Bureau Accredited Business Confidential

Your question will be referred to an attorney near you. If your question is of a legal nature, then by submitting this form you agree you are not forming a formal attorney / client relationship. Read our full privacy policy.

Looking for an InjuryBoard attorney closer to home? Click here.

Subscribe to Blog Updates

Enter your email address if you would like to receive email notifications when comments are made on this post.

Email address